Future of the Signal Corp Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Future of the Signal Corp - Research Paper Example However, implementation of the cyber offensive, defensive and network management remains a challenge to the department of defense. To support future force structure, there are fundamental strategies that the department of defense must set. Recognition of technological changes is important for successful implementation of the transformations. Signal soldiers should undertake their missions while considering the global arena’s upcoming technological challenges. The department of defense should adopt strategies that support successful implementation of the cyber offensive, defensive and network management. Adopted strategies should support reforms in accordance with the advancemnets in technology. Signal soldiers’ commanders should strive to attain six notable goals in the effort to adopt the requirements of micro-cyber transformation. First, there must be reforms in the operations of signal regiment. Second, there is necessity to upgrade the technological equipment applie d in the operations of signal regiments. Third, it is highly recommendable that there should be a change in the level of support provided to the signal regiment. Fourth, it is recommendable to update the process adopted in the purchase of necessary equipment. Modernization of the approach to training signal soldiers is the fifth concern. It is also recommendable to reduce the number of signal military specialization. Reforms should include combining signal soldiers from diverse occupational specialties to render them capable to undertake challenging missions while retaining the number. Signal soldiers should attain high level of competence in responding to demanding mission situations2. Implementation of the cyber offensive, defensive, and network management necessitates the establishment of tactical operations centers. Establishment of centers is significant to ensure successful mission command. Tactical operations center is important to enhance successful systems validation and co ordination of mission command. Training centers are essential in sensitization of signal soldiers of potential cyber threats that may hinder successful execution of their missions. Training centers are also important to sensitize soldiers on how to survive in cases of cyber attacks. Should cyber attacks threaten the network of signal soldiers, they shall have knowledge on how to respond to the situation. Trainers and army cyber commanders sensitize signal soldiers on survival in case of total failure of the entire communication system or in the absence of networks. Training at the center would advance signal soldiers’ knowledge on how they respond to and work without networks at accessible range. Successful implementation of the cyber offensive, defensive and network management requires suitable training of signal soldiers on how best to ensure protection of sensitive networks during their missions. The capability to secure and protect sensitive networks during missions is a vital success factor for signal soldiers during their missions. Knowledge on proper response mechanism is important to enhance soldiers’ success during missions. Training also focuses on enhanced cooperation between the intelligence and signal soldiers’ staffs to attend to any upcoming or arising threats during missions. Incorporating the role of intelligence and operations officers in enhancing the role of signal soldiers

What Was Thatcherism In What Sense Was It Radical Or Conservative Essay

What Was Thatcherism In What Sense Was It Radical Or Conservative - Essay Example The first is that in 20th-century Britain she was the only leader to govern over three consecutive general elections, and through eleven years of service as Prime Minister she set the record for that century. Second, as the first and so far only woman British Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher is strikingly the one individual to bequeath her name to an operative philosophy for a political course of action and modus operandi known as Thatcherism.1 Among other things, the philosophy is said to have initiated the movement from government to governance in which greater centralization, or a stronger state, is seen as paramount for the creation of a more energetic free market.2 In the wake of the 1978-1979 winter of discontent, after the Labour Party had been plagued with a stifling series of strikes by public service employees demanding better wages, the Labour government succumbed to union demands for a wage increase. The settlement met with scathing censure by Thatcher, who initiated the call for a vote of No Confidence. The subsequent 311-310 vote, left the ruling Labour Party and its government overwhelmingly defeated.3 Margaret Thatcher, as leader of the Conservative Party, campaigned for a fresh start by advocating energetic trade union control, an assertive market economy, free enterprise, radical reductions in government spending, tax cuts, a stable currency, and a reinvigorated foreign policy. Thatcher believed in private enterprise and personal accountability, and took a strong stand for family values, home ownership, reasonable personal savings, improved educational prospects, and renewed commitment to law and order.4 Thatcher's government steadily weakened trade union muscle, specifically with a determined response to the coal miners' strike of 1984-1985. The passage of measures such as rate capping and the introduction of the conflict-ridden Poll Tax in 1989 were initiated in an attempt to curb local government expenditure.5 In addition, the elimination of specific metropolitan councils, such as the abolition of the Greater London Council in 1986, were moves intended to further check local government power.6 Another long-term effort to promote consumerism and individual initiative was to privatise a large number of formerly state-owned businesses such as British Aerospace, The National Bus Company, Associated British Ports, Jaguar, and British Telecom, to name just a few.7 In addition, Thatcherism professed a strong thrust for nationalism as evinced in the Conservative government's forceful response to the 1982 clash with Argentina over the Falklands.8 In Thatcher's last term, as a consequence of rifts in the cabinet over matters concerning the European Community, the wholesale antagonistic reaction of the public to the London Poll Tax, a negative stance on the part of many to her assertive style as Prime Minister, and ultimately the diehard intransigence of much of her own Conservative Party, Thatcher resigned in 1990.9 Even though the economy in the United Kingdom enjoyed improvement in the late 1980s, in the years following Thatcher's administration, a grave economic decline with high unemployment ensued.10 Still, Thatcherism seems to enjoy a certain theoretical resilience in the face of the rational and empirical imperfections of its ephemeral results.11 If Thatcherism reflects a governing philosophy built on the policies and style of leadership of Margaret Thatcher, the broader spectrum of its interpretation and application reaches beyond Thatcher's own elucidation to entail lasting political imperatives for a conglomerate of free markets, fiscal discipline, strong control over public expenditure, tax incentives, nationalism, Victorian